ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) struck the world in 2019 and led to the development of the multisystem coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) causing a worldwide pandemic. Vaccines with boosters were developed due to novel mutations of SARS-CoV-2. Heterogeneous vaccination emerged with the perception that mixing vaccines can provide better protection. We present the case of a 68-year-old male patient who developed extensive acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left lower extremity, two weeks following the Moderna mRNA booster vaccine (mRNA-1273). His first two doses were AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S [recombinant]. He was started on a heparin drip and prescribed rivaroxaban. We discuss the possible etiology of this DVT, the mechanism of action of the Moderna mRNA vaccine, the association of DVT with vaccine-induced inflammation, implications of heterogeneous vaccine combinations, and recommendations to advise people on possible thrombogenic adverse effects prior to mRNA vaccine administration.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis (AA) remains the most common cause of acute abdomen worldwide. Although overall mortality in developed countries is low, complication due to perforation, abscess formation, stump appendicitis and intra-abdominal sepsis is associated with increased morbidity. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing proportion of complicated appendicitis has been reported. In this case, we present a 58-year-old female with a remote history of COVID-19 infection and severe appendicitis, complicated by sepsis. Viral infection has previously been proposed as a cause of appendicitis. Our report aims to describe our patient’s course and comment on a potential association with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, as well as future diagnostic and management considerations.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed the priorities in healthcare services; outpatient management of acne has changed during this period. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate treatment practices, outcomes and identify modified follow-up schedules applied during the pandemic. METHODS: The patients who were admitted to dermatology outpatient clinic between March 13 and July 13, 2020, were included. Patients who were admitted between March 13 and July 13, 2019, were served as controls for the study. For each patient, age, gender, treatment protocols, treatment intervals, compliance with the treatment, treatment modifications, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The total number of acne patients admitted to dermatology outpatient clinics during the pandemic period was 278 and consisted of 12.3% (278) of all admissions. Isotretinoin treatment was started in only 16 (5.8%) of the patients. The proportion of patients who were under follow-up was significantly higher during the pandemic period (P < 0.005). There was no difference between the pandemic period and the non-pandemic period in terms of starting isotretinoin treatment (P > 0.05). During pandemic period, 79% of the patients who used isotretinoin were followed-up every two or more months. Extended follow-up intervals showed no difference for detecting side effects (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acne patients constitute an important part of dermatology outpatient clinics. During the pandemic period, majority of acne patients came for follow-up. Extended follow-up periods were adopted by physicians and were found safe and effective in the current study. Thus, isotretinoin treatment seems efficacious and safe during pandemic period.